Gyeonggi Firefighters Press Governor for Apology and Budget Action
A firefighters’ union has called on Gyeonggi Governor Choo Mi-ae to formally address controversial remarks about firefighting finances and strengthen support for the service after a fatal factory blaze.
A firefighters’ union in Gyeonggi Province has pressed Governor Choo Mi-ae for a direct apology and stronger financial support after remarks about firefighting costs triggered anger within the emergency service.
The Fire Officials’ Division of the Korean Government Employees’ Union held a news conference outside the Gyeonggi Provincial Government complex on Tuesday. Union representatives said Choo had not adequately apologized to firefighters for referring to the service in terms they interpreted as portraying it as a drain on provincial finances.
The dispute has become particularly sensitive because it unfolded around the death of Fire Inspector Kim Jin-seok, who was killed while responding to a factory fire in Bucheon. When questioned about the controversy on the day of the fire, Choo declined to discuss it. She later expressed regret, but critics argued that her earlier response did not sufficiently acknowledge the hurt caused to frontline personnel.
After Tuesday’s news conference, Choo met union representatives and apologized again. She said she had been unable to fully convey her feelings at the time and was sorry if her words had caused pain. The union acknowledged the apology during the opening of a meeting that lasted about 40 minutes.
Union officials also criticized Democratic Party lawmaker Boo Seung-chan for using a similar description during a parliamentary audit and called on him to clarify his position. Their demands extended beyond the language used by public officials. They asked the provincial government to establish a fact-finding team for the Bucheon factory fire that would include bereaved family members and outside experts.
The union also requested an expansion of the firefighting budget, linking the dispute to broader concerns about whether emergency crews have adequate resources and institutional support. The confrontation has therefore developed into both a question of accountability for public remarks and a policy debate over funding for essential safety services.
For Gyeonggi Province, the meeting may ease some of the immediate tension, but the firefighters’ requests leave concrete decisions ahead. Any investigation into the Bucheon blaze would need to establish a transparent structure and scope, while budget proposals would face scrutiny over staffing, equipment and the division of responsibility between central and local government. The union’s response indicates that a verbal apology alone may not settle the controversy without follow-through on those issues.
